There are few things that bring as
much as fear to a doctoral student as the word "defense". What are
faculty looking for? Why is a defense necessary? (Keep in mind that you should
have a discussion of these issues with your own committee, as they may have
different ideas/ philosophies).
Despite its name, a
doctoral defense is rarely confrontational, it is an opportunity for everyone
to hear the full study one more time and make sure any possible bugs have been
eliminated. As a faculty reviewer, I am looking to see that the student
understands the study they are discussing. Today, in a time of massive concerns
of cheating and plagiarism, I want to be sure that this has really been the
student's ideas.
In a proposal
defense, I want to hear a brief discussion of the literature and theory, enough
to put it into context. I expect to have the student discuss the research
questions and how they relate to his or her research method. I want to hear
about the method in detail so I can determine if there are any issues that we
should discuss. My questions will primarily be clarification ones, e.g., how
will recruitment be done? Have you considered what you will do if you cannot
get sufficient participants? How would you interpret results that do not come
out as expected, how would that effect the theory you are using?
It is ok to admit
that you do not know something, but offer to find it out and report back on it.
If you are not sure how to handle a method issue that arises, ask for your
committee's suggestions. Keep in mind that in research you are going into the
unknown, there are often a variety of way to reach the destination.
Next time we will consider
the IRB. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss
in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas!
leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu
No comments:
Post a Comment