How do you read research articles? I think everyone develops
their own system, but here are a few suggestions.
Decide what you want to know from the article before you start
reading. Are you trying to get general information? Are you concerned with
methodology? You may not need to read the entire article, but only pieces to
get the info you need. Be very careful about simply taking their discussion
comments as the results of the study- writers often over-interpret their
results, so check them yourself.
Develop a shorthand or marking system. Whether you read the
article's pdf or a paper version, you should be developing a method to keep
track of important info. I tend to read pdfs, so I highlight in yellow the key
points that I want to be able to find again. I also write myself notes in the
article, using "add sticky note" in Adobe Acrobat about why I think
the highlighted text is important (e.g., "interesting qual method,"
"confirms my idea on self-efficacy in this population"). If you are
reading the paper version, you can add sticky notes marking important issues
(consider color coded ones, e.g., pink = method issue). Have a master list of
what your codes/ colors mean so you remain consistent.
You may want to keep an Excel file of articles with key
points for each article you read. An alternative is do use a bibliographic
software such as Endnotes, and make comments in the entries.
The trick to all of these is to be consistent in using and
maintaining them. Decide on how you want to read articles- in pdfs or in paper
version and set up a filing system to work with your method.
Next time I will talk about reading articles' literature
reviews. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss
in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas!
leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu
No comments:
Post a Comment