Students frequently ask me, what is the best way to
integrate research as I write? This is one of those issues that everyone has
their own way of doing. I will share mine- I tend to read sections of articles
then go to my document and summarize what I read and add a citation. Here is an
example, an original article:
Professionals
involved in the training of psychology graduate students, both in educational
and clinical settings (e.g., practicum and internship), need to understand the
role of stress among students to provide guidance on effective stress
management and self-care (Myers, Sweeney, Popick, Wesley, Bordfeld, &
Fingerhut, 2012, p. 55).
I would paraphrase it as: It is important that psychology
faculty involved in graduate student training understand and be able to offer
student assistance in stress related self-care (Myers et al., 2012).
Some things to notice, I did not say something like
"Myers et al. (2012) stated that…." These types of phrasings read
very choppy and come across as unprofessional (I always think of it as undergrad-like).
You want your writing to flow and tell a story- it is not a simple listing of
study after study. If you find yourself writing lists of studies, it is time to
stop and rethink what you want to say. What point are you trying to make about the
studies? Think about it on a higher level than the individual studies, what is
linking those studies together? Then write about the higher-level issues
bringing in the individual studies as examples.
Avoid quotes as much as possible; only bring them in if they
add something unique to your argument. Check out peer reviewed articles; you
will find that quotes are very rarely used.
Next time I will talk about isolation. Do you have an issue
or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you
like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu
Myers,
S.B., Sweeney, A. C., Popick, V., Wesley, K., Bordfeld, A., & Fingerhut, R.
(2012). Self-care practices and perceived stress levels among psychology
graduate students. Training and Education
in Professional Psychology, 6(1), 55-66.
No comments:
Post a Comment