Last time we looked at how to do an independent ANOVA, today
we look at the (one-way) repeated measures ANOVA. This examines whether the
means of 2 or more related samples (i.e., using the same people) are
significantly different. An example might be a pretest, immediate posttest, and
a posttest 6 mon. later. Our research question is – are the means for the 3 times
significantly different from each other? The independent variable is time (pretest, immediate posttest, 6 mon
posttest), the dependent variable is the scores on a test. Our null hypothesis
is that there will be no difference between the time periods. An important
point: our ANOVA will only tell us if there is a significant difference
present, it will NOT tell us, which groups are different from each other. To
find this out, we will need to post hoc tests (more on this later). Let's do an
example together. So open SPSS and enter the following data for your samples:
Under Variable view (see tab at bottom of page), It should
look like:
Name
|
Type
|
Width
|
Decimals
|
Label
|
Values
|
Ignore the rest
|
prettest
|
numeric
|
8
|
0
|
Pretest
|
None
|
Ignore the rest
|
posttest1
|
numeric
|
8
|
0
|
Immediate Posttest
|
None
|
|
posttest2
|
numeric
|
8
|
0
|
6mon Posttest
|
None
|
Ignore the rest
|
Pretest
|
Immediate Posttest
|
6mon Posttest
|
3
|
6
|
9
|
5
|
8
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
5
|
4
|
9
|
7
|
1
|
6
|
4
|
You will get a lot of tables for this- we are only going to
use the following:
Descriptive Statistics
|
|||
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
N
|
Pretest
|
3.00
|
1.581
|
5
|
Immediate Posttest
|
6.80
|
1.643
|
5
|
6mon Posttest
|
5.60
|
2.408
|
5
|
Multivariate Testsa
|
|||||||
Effect
|
Value
|
F
|
Hypothesis df
|
Error df
|
Sig.
|
Partial Eta Squared
|
|
time
|
Pillai's Trace
|
.939
|
22.971b
|
2.000
|
3.000
|
.015
|
.939
|
Wilks' Lambda
|
.061
|
22.971b
|
2.000
|
3.000
|
.015
|
.939
|
|
Hotelling's Trace
|
15.314
|
22.971b
|
2.000
|
3.000
|
.015
|
.939
|
|
Roy's Largest Root
|
15.314
|
22.971b
|
2.000
|
3.000
|
.015
|
.939
|
|
a. Design: Within
Subjects Design: time
|
|||||||
b. Exact statistic
|
Pairwise Comparisons
|
||||||
Measure: MEASURE_1
|
||||||
(I) time
|
(J) time
|
Mean Difference (I-J)
|
Std. Error
|
Sig.b
|
95% Confidence Interval for Differenceb
|
|
Lower Bound
|
Upper Bound
|
|||||
1
|
2
|
-3.800*
|
.490
|
.004
|
-5.740
|
-1.860
|
3
|
-2.600
|
1.288
|
.341
|
-7.703
|
2.503
|
|
2
|
1
|
3.800*
|
.490
|
.004
|
1.860
|
5.740
|
3
|
1.200
|
1.319
|
1.000
|
-4.025
|
6.425
|
|
3
|
1
|
2.600
|
1.288
|
.341
|
-2.503
|
7.703
|
2
|
-1.200
|
1.319
|
1.000
|
-6.425
|
4.025
|
|
Based on estimated marginal means
|
||||||
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
|
||||||
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni.
|
What does this
mean? There is a significant difference between the 3 times (see where I marked
in yellow above). This does not tell you which groups are different from each
other, to find this out we did Bonferroni post hoc tests and found that the pretest
varied significantly from the immediate posttest (see data marked in yellow
above), no other groups differed. So let's write it up as you would in your
paper:
A repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to compare scores at
the pretest (M = 3.0; SD = 1.58),
immediate posttest (M = 6.8; SD =
1.6), and the 6 mon posttest (M =
5.6; SE = 2.4). The results (Wilks' Lambda = .061. F(2, 3) =22.97, p= .015,
multivariate eta squared = .939 [large effect]) indicates that there is a
significant difference between the time periods and the null hypothesis is
rejected. Bonferroni post hoc tests examined which groups differed. It was
found that only the pretest and immediate posttest scores differed (p< .05).
A great resource for SPSS is
Pallant, J. (2013). The
SPSS Survival Manual, 5th edition. Open University Press.
We have examined the most common (and easy to explain in a
blog) statistical tests. Next time, we will take a look at anxiety and the
dissertation. Do you
have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post?
Send me an email with your ideas. leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu
No comments:
Post a Comment