Monday, February 27, 2017

Blog index

2017, Current to 2/28
Topic
Dates of Posts
Dissertation, general
1/20, 2/1
Dissertation calculator

Selecting a Topic
1/27
Committee Members

Mentor Interviews

URR

Center for Research Quality

Overview of Process

Premise

Prospectus

Proposal

Research questions
2/10
Research design
2/13, 2/17
Theory
2/6, 2/8
C. 1

C. 2 (literature related)
1/11
C. 3

Defense
1/9
IRB
2/15
Data Collection
2/20, 2/22, 2/24
Quantitative

Qualitative

Mixed Methods

C. 4
1/2
C. 5
1/4
Appendixes

Final Defense

Career
1/23
Goal Form

Motivation

Organizing

Secondary Data
1/13
Support, Getting

Resilience

Writing
1/16, 1/18
Other
1/6, 1/25, 2/3


Previous Years
Topic
Dates of Posts - 2014
Dates of Posts - 2015
Dates of Posts - 2016
Dissertation, general
6/25, 12/5
1/7, 3/6, 11/20, 12/16
4/8, 4/11, 5/11, 6/20, 8/29, 9/2
Dissertation calculator
9/5
3/9
4/15
Selecting a Topic
4/28, 5/9, 8/25

9/7
Committee Members
5/7, 10/8, 12/22
9/14, 10/14, 12/18
8/10, 9/19
Mentor Interviews


9/21, 9/23, 9/26
URR



Center for Research Quality



Overview of Process



Prospectus
4/4, 4/7, 4/9, 4/11, 4/14, 4/18, 4/21, 4/23, 4/25, 4/28, 5/2, 5/5, 8/27

2/3
Proposal
9/8, 11/3, 11/5

2/5
Research questions
4/18
6/19
4/13
Research Design

6/15, 6/22, 6/26

Theory

6/15, 6/17
2/1, 4/27, 5/2, 5/4
C. 1
11/7
3/11, 3/13, 3/16, 3/18, 3/20, 9/18, 9/21
3/23, 10/1, 10/3, 10/5, 10/7, 10/10, 10/12
C. 2 (literature related)
6/9, 6/11, 6/16, 9/10, 9/15, 9/17, 9/19, 9/26, 9/29, 11/10, 12/26
1/9, 3/23, 3/25, 3/27, 4/3, 4/8, 9/23, 10/21
1/4, 1/6, 1/8, 1/11, 1/13, 1/15, 1/20, 1/22,1/25, 2/10, 3/7, 3/9, 7/11, 7/13, 8/22, 10/14, 10/17, 10/19, 10/21, 10/24
C. 3
1/3, 1/6, 1/13, 11/12
4/10, 4/13, 4/15, 4/17, 4/20, 4/22, 4/24, 4/27, 4/29, 5/4, 5/6, 5/8, 5/11, 5/13, 5/15, 5/18, 9/25
3/21, 3/25, 10/26, 10/28, 11/7, 11/9, 11/11, 11/14, 11/16, 11/18, 11/21, 11/25, 12/2, 12/3, 12/5, 12/7, 12/8
Defense

9/28

IRB
1/10, 1/15, 1/17, 1/20, 1/22, 1/24, 1/27, 1/29, 2/3, 2/5, 2/7, 2/10, 2/12, 2/17, 2/19, 2/21, 2/24, 10/13, 10/15, 10/17, 10/20, 10/22, 10/24, 10/27
6/24 10/5
3/28, 4/4
Data Collection

6/24, 11/23, 11/27, 12/4, 12/7, 12/9
6/3, 6/6, 6/8, 6/10, 6/13, 6/15, 6/17
Quantitative
1/3, 2/26, 3/12, 7/9, 7/14, 7/16, 7/18, 7/21, 7/23, 7/25, 7/28
5/4, 5/8, 5/11, 5/13, 5/15, 7/1, 7/6, 7/8, 7/13, 7/15, 7/17, 7/20, 7/22, 7/24
11/9, 11/11, 11/18, 11/25, 12/21
Qualitative
1/6, 3/14, 10/29, 12/12, 12/15, 12/17, 12/19
1/5, 1/12, 10/19
5/16, 5/18, 5/20, 5/23, 8/1, 11/2, 11/4, 11/16, 12/3, 12/5, 12/7, 12/19, 12/26
Mixed Methods
1/3, 1/6
4/10, 5/6, 5/8, 5/11, 5/13, 5/15
11/2, 11/4, 11/18, 11/25, 12/5, 12/7, 12/16, 12/19
C. 4
3/5, 3/10, 3/12, 3/14, 3/17, 3/19, 3/21, 11/14
5/20, 5/22, 5/25, 5/27, 6/3, 6/5, 10/7
9/16, 12/12, 12/14, 12/16, 12/19, 12/21, 12/26
C. 5
3/21, 3/24, 3/26, 3/28, 11/19
6/5, 6/8, 6/10, 6/12, 10/9

Appendixes



Final Defense

10/12

Career
8/18, 8/20

9/9
Goal Form
5/23, 5/26, 6/2, 8/15, 11/24


Motivation
1/1, 6/4, 6/6, 7/4, 7/11, 9/22, 10/10, 12/3
1/21, 3/2, 7/3, 7/10, 9/2, 9/4, 9/7, 9/9 9/11
5/9, 7/1, 7/4, 7/6, 7/8, 7/15, 7/20, 7/22, 7/25, 8/8, 8/15
Organizing
8/1, 8/4, 8/6, 8/8, 8/11, 8/13, 12/8
7/27, 7/29, 8/3, 8/5, 8/10
2/22, 2/24, 2/26, 3/4
Secondary Data
2/24


Support, Getting
5/21
1/26
8/17
Resilience

2/6, 2/16, 2/18, 2/20, 2/23, 2/25, 3/4
5/25, 5/27
Writing
5/16, 5/19, 6/16, 6/18, 6/20, 7/2, 7/7, 8/27, 12/10
1/14, 1/23, 2/9, 12/11, 12/14
3/11, 3/14, 3/16, 6/24, 7/18, 8/3, 8/5, 8/12, 8/26
Other
2/14, 3/3, 3/7, 4/16, 5/12, 5/14, 5/28, 6/2, 6/13, 6/23, 6/27, 8/22, 9/1, 9/3, 9/12, 10/3, 10/6, 11/17, 11/26, 12/1, 12/24, 12/29, 12/31
1/16, 1/19, 1/28, 1/30, 2/4, 2/11, 2/13, 4/1, 4/6, 6/1, 8/12, 8/14, 8/19, 8/21, 8/24, 8/26, 8/31, 9/16, 10/2, 10/16, 10/23, 10/26, 10/28, 11/2, 11/4, 11/6, 11/9, 11/11, 11/13, 11/16, 11/18, 11/25, 12/2, 12/21, 12/23, 12/25, 12/28
1/1, 1/17, 1/29, 2/12, 2/15, 2/17, 3/2, 4/1, 4/6, 4/18, 4/20, 4/22, 4/25, 5/6, 5/13, 6/1, 6/22, 6/27, 7/27, 8/17, 8/19, 8/24, 9/12, 9/14, 9/19, 9/28, 11/23, 11/28, 12/23, 12/30
Next time I will welcome spring. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu

Friday, February 24, 2017

What Mode for Your Survey?

There are three modes of administering surveys, they are face-to-face, telephone, and self-administered (on paper or through the computer). How do you decide which to use? There is no single best method; all have advantages and disadvantages, which are summarized in the table below (modified from Vogt et al., 2012, p. 20).
                                                                                Mode of administration
Advantages and disadvantages
Face-to-Face
Telephone
Self-Administered
1. Usable with respondents who cannot read
Yes
Yes
No
2. Researcher can explain the meaning of a question
Yes
Yes
No
3. Researcher knows identity of respondent
Yes
Yes
No
4. Interaction with administer of survey
High
Medium
Low
5. Certainty that all respondents get exactly the same question
Low
Medium
High
6. Cost per respondent
High
Medium
Low
7. Time per question
High
High
Low
8. Possible to administer in groups
Yes
No
Yes
9. Effort required to obtain a large sample size
High
Medium
Low
10. Problems of access to respondents in remote or unsafe areas
Yes
No
No
11. Researcher's efficiency tied to that of postal, internet, or telephone system
No
Yes
Yes
As the researcher, you need to weigh each of these considerations, keeping both the advantages and disadvantages in mind.

Next time I will post an updated blog index. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

A Research Opportunity!

Drs. Amy Sickel and Lee Stadtlander, faculty at Walden University, are seeking doctoral level students and faculty as participants for a research study. This study will be validating a new survey on doctoral writing and writing efficacy (self-confidence). You will be asked to complete a series of 4 surveys related to research and doctoral writing. This 30-minute study is completely confidential and may give you some insights into your own writing and research skills. As a thank you for participating, the first 100 participants will receive a $10 Starbuck's gift card. If you are interested, please go to https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/validate_writing_survey
The study will close on March 17, 2017


Survey questions

Continuing our discussion of surveys:

4. You know how you will use the answers.
You need to have a clear idea as to how you will use the survey questions to address your research questions. Keep in mind that short surveys are generally much better than long ones in keeping participants focused and finishing the survey.

Each of your research questions typically relate to a number of survey questions. It is a good idea to match up your research and interview questions to make sure that you will actually be able to answer your research questions. If you have survey questions without a matching research question, you probably do not need the survey questions. If you have a research question without a survey question, you need to add more survey questions. Here is an example of matching a research question and survey questions. 

Research Questions
Survey Questions
1. How do patients' searches, for health related information on the internet, relate to visits to their primary health provider?
1. In the past month, have you searched for health related information on the internet?
2. Before your most recent visit to your primary health provider, did you search for any health related information on the internet?
3. After your most recent visit to your primary health provider, did you search for any health related information on the internet?

You should also have a plan as to how you will analyze the data you collect. Without such a plan, you may come to realize that you have collected hundreds of surveys with a missing variable that is needed for your analysis. As an example, if you would like to analyze your data using gender as an independent variable, make sure you have included it in the survey.

5. You can expect an adequate response rate.
An otherwise excellent survey study can be ruined by a low response rate. The difficulty is that if only a small proportion of the people you ask to be in the survey actually complete it, you can no longer generalize to the population of interest. For this reason, if you suspect a low response rate is likely, you would be better off having fewer people and then interview them.

What is a good response rate? There is not a clear answer to this. You will need to review the literature and see what others report. There are a few things you can do to improve your response rate. Using a university's participant pool, generally results in a high rate of response (keep in mind they are not representative of the general population). If you can guarantee respondents that their answers will be anonymous (the researcher does not know who responded), it generally helps. The second best choice is guaranteeing confidentiality (only the researcher knows who responded).

Next time we will continue our discussion of surveys. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu

Monday, February 20, 2017

Survey Research

Surveys are popular, because they are efficient; researchers can gather a great deal of information for a small cost and generally in a short amount of time. To consider whether surveys are a good idea for your study, consider these issues (from Vogt, Gardner & Haeffele (2012).

1. The data are best obtained directly from the respondents
2. Your data can be obtained by brief answers to structured questions.
3. You can expect respondents to give you reliable information.
4. You know how you will use the answers.
5. You can expect an adequate response rate.

Now let us consider each of these issues.
1. The data are best obtained directly from the respondents.
Often the only way to obtain information about people is by asking them. This is especially true of subjective data, i.e., the inner states of the subjects being studied, such as attitudes, beliefs, or values. You can also use surveys to collect objective data, such as respondents' age, income, or years of work experience, which could be obtained in other ways, but it is usually easier simply to ask. However, if you have access to records, such as educational and medical records, these may be more accurate and possibly more efficient than asking individuals. People's memories are notoriously poor on such questions, as "how often have you visited your doctor in the past year." Having access to their records would make it much more accurate. Keep in mind that asking unimportant or needless questions tend to annoy participants and they may quit your study because of it.

2. Your data can be obtained by brief answers to structured questions.
Surveys work best when asking structured questions. Structure refers to the degree of control you want to exercise over the answers you will get. The questions may be either completely unstructured and vague or highly structured. The more structured the questions, the more participants are constrained to your predetermined answers. Therefore, you may be limiting their responses; they may have other things to say. On the other hand, having broad and exploratory questions as in interviews, may not be the best choice for surveys, as the data may not be able to be summarized.

3. You can expect respondents to give you reliable information.
Sometimes surveys are an unwise choice because respondents may find it difficult to answer accurately or truthfully. Perhaps the information you seek is hard to remember or too sensitive for people to be willing to reveal it to a stranger. It is often assumed that social desirability biases much survey research, meaning that respondents may answer questions to reflect what they think is socially appropriate rather than what they really believe or do. Racial beliefs and attitudes provide an example of this. An example given by Vogt et al. (2012) is in the second half of the 20th century, the number of people answering national surveys in ways indicating they held a racial prejudice dropped rapidly compared to earlier surveys. Whether people were less prejudiced in the 1990s than in the 1950s is uncertain. However, it is clear that the behavior of respondents on the same survey questions dramatically changed.

Next time we will continue our discussion of surveys. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu


Friday, February 17, 2017

Surveys: Structure and Truth


Surveys work best when asking structured questions. Structure refers to the degree of control you want to exercise over the answers you will get. The questions may be either completely unstructured and vague or highly structured. The more structured the questions, the more participants are constrained to your predetermined answers. Therefore, you may be limiting their responses; they may have other things to say. On the other hand, having broad and exploratory questions as in interviews, may not be the best choice for surveys, as the data may unable to be summarized.

Sometimes surveys are an unwise choice because respondents may find it difficult to answer accurately or truthfully. Perhaps the information you seek is hard to remember or too sensitive for people to be willing to reveal it to a stranger. It is often assumed that social desirability biases much survey research, meaning that respondents may answer questions to reflect what they think is socially appropriate rather than what they really believe or do. Racial beliefs and attitudes provide an example of this. In the second half of the 20th century, the number of people answering national surveys in ways indicating they held a racial prejudice dropped rapidly compared to earlier surveys. Whether people were less prejudiced in the 1990s than in the 1950s is uncertain. However, it is clear that the behavior of respondents on the same survey questions dramatically changed. 

Next time we will continue our discussion of surveys. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu