Wednesday, May 11, 2016

What is a dissertation?

What is a dissertation, and why is required to get a Ph.D.? It might help to take a step back and consider, what is a Ph.D.? This is a Doctor of Philosophy; it is a research degree, meaning that during the process of getting the degree you were trained as researcher. Your dissertation is therefore the demonstration of your ability to conduct research and to write professionally. It is considered the terminal (or highest) degree in your professional field. Receiving the degree places you in an elite group (less than 4% of the US population has a professional degree), and it is evidence of your professionalism and learning.

Why are you required to do research to show you are a professional? Conducting a research project shows your persistence and ability to complete a large project. It integrates all that you have learned in your education and shows that you can formulate new questions for future learning. Most degrees simply show learning; however, a Ph.D. also shows your ability to go further and explore unknown areas, to develop research that answers questions. It shows that you are a logical and critical thinker; you can synthesize ideas, data and information, and write in a technical and professional manner. Being able to conduct research also shows that you are able to sift through information to find the current thinking in the field; as well as able to apply theory to your thinking, practice, investigations, and current events. The dissertation is considered the first step in your future research plan for the rest of your professional life. Will you have to stay in this topic area? No, but you will have the ability to plan and execute future studies.

At the completion of your project, you are assumed to be able to teach in your areas of expertise – both content and method at a college or university level. No licensure beyond the doctorate is required to teach in post-secondary institutions.

Is the dissertation "just another paper to write?" No, it really is much more than that; it is a very formalized document that demonstrates your expertise in your chosen area of interest. Once you have completed the project, you are considered an expert in this area. The paper will eventually be published in the dissertation databases, and will be a part of the professional literature. Other researchers and graduate students interested in your topic will read it in the future.

There are a number of implications of these issues. (a) Your literature review must be correct and as complete as possible, both to demonstrate your expertise and also for future researchers. (b) Your research methods must be as accurate and complete as possible, so others know exactly what you did in your study. Consider the future researcher who does a study similar to yours but gets different results. He or she will want to be able to compare the two samples and methods to determine why the difference occurred. (c) Your paper must be written in the format required for publication, and the formatting will be checked before you are allowed to defend the final draft. (d) This paper will follow you forever. Any future employer or colleague will be able to look up this document. (e) For many students, your dissertation will be your first published work. Think of it as your first child, yes, you will make mistakes, and when you look back at it years later, you will see things you should have done differently. For your future self, make it as elegant as possible and something of which you are and will be proud. 

Next time I will look at superstitions. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu

Monday, May 9, 2016

Making your dissertation into an article: literature

Ever wonder how to cut your literature review in your dissertation down for an article? Check out today's Editorial blog:
http://jsbhseditorblog.blogspot.com/

Small efforts

"Success is the sum of small efforts, repeated day-in and day-out." -Robert Collier, author

This quote is the essence of working on a dissertation: small efforts, small steps, doing a little something every day. Sometimes life seems to overwhelm and it seems impossible to work on your paper, but remember this quote and do a little something on it- file some papers, read an article, just think about your project – perhaps consider your theory and what it predicts.

Every day to something on your dissertation, sit and write for an hour, read articles in the waiting room or while you are waiting for someone. You can do this… one small step at a time.

Next time I will examine: what is a dissertation?  Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu

Friday, May 6, 2016

Tick Tock

Isn’t it amazing how fast time goes by? We are already into May, how far have you progressed on your dissertation this year? Perhaps you need a helping hand to guide you along the way, if so I strongly suggest you pick up my book: Finding Your Way to a Ph.D.: Advice from the Dissertation Mentor that takes you step-by-step through the dissertation process. It discusses dealing with committee members, tips on writing each chapter and getting through the IRB process. Some recent reviews on Amazon:

"This is a fantastic book for any PhD candidate. It contains detailed and thoughtful guidance for navigating the challenges that all PhD candidates, whether they are savvy researchers or very new and clueless students, with ease and grace and humor. Lee's prose is readable and engaging."

"An excellent book for doctoral students who are working on their dissertation. The book provides a step by step guide in how to develop a prospectus to writing your final dissertation chapter. Tips on motivating self is worth reading multiple times. There are many books that try to explain the dissertation process, but fail to answer clearly the students questions. This book is easy to read and a book that should be kept on your desk in eye view, at all times. I encourage all dissertation students to add this book to your library. You will find the book is an excellent reference guide just like the APA Manual book."

"For any student pursuing a doctorate, this book will be your guide. It is an easy read yet packed with practical and important information to help you achieve your goal of a "done" dissertation! Dr. Stadtlander utilized her wealth of knowledge and experience to create a text for the benefit of all who choose to pursue a doctorate. Thank you for such a reference! I strongly recommend this book. "

Give yourself the benefit of all of the help you can! 

Next time, I will discuss small efforts. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Would you like to be a guest writer? Send me your ideas! leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Theory and Research Questions

Previously, we considered theories and that they should lead to predictions. Now we take it to the next step and use those predictions to develop research questions. We examined the patient-by-treatment-context interactive model of Christensen and Johnson (2002), and we predicted it is the primary health provider (PHP) who is the determining factor, so if the PHP is understanding of a patient's nontraditional medical beliefs, it should increase vaccination use.  Now we can develop a research question based on the prediction.

RQ1: What is the relationship between PHP's support of patients' nontraditional medical beliefs and patients' use of vaccinations?

To use this research question we would need to have a way to measure "PHP's support of patients' nontraditional medical beliefs" and also a way to measure the patients' beliefs. If you are able to find such measurement tools in the literature, great! You could do a quantitative study measuring PHPs' support, patients' beliefs, and the actual use of vaccinations. However, let us say you could not find such measurement tools. You have a couple of choices: 1) develop your own measures or 2) do a qualitative study to examine the opinions of both patients and PHPs. This last choice would require two new research questions.

RQ2: What are PHPs' opinions about patients' nontraditional medical beliefs and vaccinations?

RQ3: What are patients', with nontraditional medical beliefs, opinions about their PHPs and vaccinations?

Here is how we went about this process: from our review of the literature, we found an appropriate theory. The theory led to predictions and our research questions. The research questions suggested the appropriate research method. 

Notice, I did not start with the method, rather I let the theory, predictions, and research questions determine the appropriate research method to use. 

Next time I will consider the passing of time. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Send me an email with your ideas. leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu

Monday, May 2, 2016

Writing an article based on your dissertation

Ever wonder how you can make your dissertation into a published article in a journal? See http://jsbhseditorblog.blogspot.com/ for the start of a new series on this topic!

Considering Theories

As an example in order to think things through theories, I will be using the patient-by-treatment-context interactive model of Christensen and Johnson (2002). The model proposes that the relationship between patient characteristics (e.g., personality and beliefs) and patient adherence (e.g., preventative care) is moderated by the treatment context (e.g., primary health provider characteristics and behavior). I like to draw things out so I get a better understanding of it.


We can begin tweaking some of the variables and think about how they would be affected in the model. For example, we could consider patients who do not have faith in modern medicine and the issue of vaccination use. The model suggests it is the primary health provider (PHP) who is the determining factor, so if the PHP was understanding of the patient's beliefs, according to the model, it should increase vaccination use.  This is how we went about this process so far: we reviewed the literature, which led to theory, which led to predictions.

Next time I will discuss theory and research questions. Do you have an issue or a question that you would like me to discuss in a future post? Send me an email with your ideas. leann.stadtlander@waldenu.edu